DJDurant Loss Prevention | Retail Management

14Oct/100

Controlling Risk: Slips, trips, and falls

Exterior

  • Parking lot is in good repair.
  • Curbs are flush with sidewalks.
  • Sidewalks are level and obstruction free.
  • Water drains away from sidewalks/parking areas.
  • Sidewalks and parking areas are well illuminated.
  • Changes in exterior surface levels/elevations are marked.
  • Snow and ice removed; surfaces treated (seasonal only).
  • Stairsteps have a non-slip surface.
  • Stairwells are illuminated, clean, and unobstructed.
  • Handrails are present, tight, and in good condition.

Interior

  • Public areas are clean, well illuminated, and unobstructed.
  • Carpeting is tight, smooth, and free of tears and rips.
  • Doormats are flat, slip-resistant, and clean.
  • Mats absorb tracked-in moisture.
  • Stairwells are illuminated, clean, and unobstructed.
  • Handrails are present, tight, and in good condition.
  • Changes in interior floor level elevation are marked.
  • Emergency lighting is operational.
  • Emergency phone numbers clearly are posted.
  • Trash is regularly removed.

General

  • Make regular surveys of the property.
  • Follow up promptly on items needing corrective action.
  • Record completed work.
  • Train staff to identify, mark, and report potential hazards for prompt follow up.
  • Train staff to contact emergency phone numbers and to assist injured parties.
14Oct/100

LP Strategies to reduce litigation risk

Just read a great article on reducing risk from from retail loss prevention activities. Tons of great information.

While the goal of any loss-prevention program must be to prevent loss, a well-crafted program will be designed to minimize the risk of collateral litigation, which can arise under both state and federal law.

One line in particular is interesting:

On a broader level, stores should emphasize preventing the loss over making the apprehension. Detentions and recovery quotas should be de-emphasized.

Full article can be found at BlankRome.com.

I think this is very important. One bad stop can result in major problems for a retailer. Each shoplifter stopped is an unknown variable. You don't know what they will do to avoid being detained. (Read news stories about shoplifting stops that went bad at LPDiscussions.com) This doesn't mean you never stop a shoplifter, but you need to take extra care to ensure the safety of your staff and minimize exposure to the business.

13Oct/100

Time, commitments, and over extension

168 hours per week.

That's the limit. We can spend less, we can spend it all, but we can never over spend. I can't use an extra 20 hours this week, and only have 148 hours in some future week. I can't save 10 hours this week, and apply it towards next week.

Each week we have to consciously decide how each of the 168 will be spent. X hours on work. Y hours on family. Z hours on sleep. No matter the number of variables, the total will always be 168.

I proactively schedule all my time. My calendar is filled with blocks of color denoting. Work, drive time, family time, sleep, free time(yeah right!), and everything else are neatly blocked off. Yet I find it too easy to commit to new projects. I'm actively reducing extraneous activities until I spend what's in my budget of 168 hours.

168.

Filed under: Productivity No Comments
9Oct/100

New Project : LPDiscussions.com

I've started up a new forum website focused on Loss Prevention. LPDiscussions.com is focused on the open sharing of loss prevention tactics and strategy. I hope everyone will take a few minutes to join and start participating.

9Oct/100

High refunds as a % of sales?

On LinkedIn the following question was asked in the Loss Prevention Professionals group:

I am looking for advice or suggestions on how LP can help reduce the refunds % to sales in a single location.

There are two cases as why a store's return/sales ratio would be higher than like stores.
1) Refund fraud by employees.
2) Refund abuse by customers.
In both cases it is important to close loop holes. Define a policy and procedure on how refunds are completed, and then put in place a method to detect deviations from policy/procedure.

Ask yourself the following questions:
-Who does the transaction? (Manager/supervisor?)
-How should the refund be approved? (Double verification? Two employees sign off?)
-Where should the refund be completed? (I designate a specific register that has good camera views of the customer and the employee. Using any other register for a return is a major red flag.)
-What documentation is required? (ID? Original receipt?)
-Where does refunded product go? (I require a manager to see every returned product. This helps ensure that product is actually returned.)

Investigate every transaction that varies from procedure, and document these occurences.

Use available data to zero in on problem transactions:
-Multipe refunds, one receipt: Can indicate that a customer returned one item, and the cashier/manager is using the receipt to refund the remaining items for cash.
-UPC keyed, not scanned: Could mean that cashier/manager is using a found receipt to key in UPCs of items to refund (since the actual item isn't at the desk).
-Multiples of a single item: Item may be available or near the register, and cashier/manager uses that item to refund for cash.
-Percent of refund dollars to sales dollars/Percent of refund transactions/sales transactions: Deviation from the company/store average can indicate fraudlent refund transactions.
-Multiple refunds to same credit card: It's not unusual for a person committing refund fraud to refund the money to their own credit card/debit card(or an accomplice's card).
-Loose receipts at register: Receipts left behind by customers or reprinted receipts are left at register instead of being thrown away immediately.
-Reprinted receipt used for refund: A reprinted receipt (your receipts do indicate "Not original receipt" or "Duplicate" when reprinted?) is used for a refund could indicate cashier/manager reprinted the receipt to use for a refund.
-Look for refunds that occur before the store opens or after it closes. (You could be surprised!)

9Oct/100

Four steps to having a great operating store

1. Hire the right people.
2. Train them to do their jobs.
3. Hold them accountable.
4. Treat them with respect.

9Oct/101

Clear plastic bags or purses to deter employee theft?

I've been following a discussion on linkedin.com about instituting a clear plastic bag/purse policy to deter employee theft. I'm using this topic as a collection point for the information I'm finding regarding the subject.

Several people described the policy as ineffective because of the following reasons:
-Wasn't required or enforced for management.
-Bags/purses were not checked when employees left work.
-Not enough time to check bags.
-Person who checks bag does not want to "accuse" somone so they do not report an incident.
-The employee will just steal some other way.(this argument can be made for any policy!)

I see the above as a failure of execution rather than a flaw in the actual policy. Effectively designing and implementing a policy of clear purses/bags could avoid many of the flaws outlined above.

-Top-down implementation - all levels of management need to follow the policy.
-Rotate employees performing bag checks frequently. Randomly perform "second" checks where a manager performs a bag check after the initial check.
-Make the check part of the clock-out procedure at the store so it is not skipped.

I think what a clear purse/bag policy does is create risk. If in an employee that wants to steal thinks the risk is too great they will not steal. This policy could push employees on the fence about stealing away from the theft.

9Oct/100

What happens when you lack internal controls…

Here are four stories of employee theft, fraud, and embezzlement that illustrate how a lack of internal controls results in loss.

A former investment banker has admitted stealing almost $NZ18 million from ASB customers in New Zealand's largest employee theft.

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/banker-admits-to-biggest-nz-employee-theft-20100202-n9k0.html

“It was the Friday of Labor Day weekend. I suddenly don’t have a secretary. I’m thinking of everything I have [to review]: what’s gone in and out of the trust account, the accounts receivables. Plus I’ve got client work to do, and a brief was due the following week,” Olson recalled.

All told, his assistant of about 18 months had stolen approximately $20,000. It took Olson’s newly-retired wife about 90 days, working all day long, to piece together their losses. The now-former assistant had covered her tracks very well.

Source: http://wislawjournal.com/article.cfm/2010/02/08/Office-theft-cases-illustrate-importance-of-oversight

Much of the rest, about $900,000, was because of employee theft, unethical behaviour and wasted resources.

In one incident, a worker reversed two bank deposits and pocketed about $273,000.

Another employee stole $63,000 in petty cash and money orders. The employee was disciplined and no longer works for the city. Police are investigating.

Source: http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100205/auditor_report_100205/20100205/?hub=TorontoNewHome

A 25-year-old Middletown man surrendered to state police today to face charges he embezzled funds for two years from his employer.
Andrew Chambers, of East Dickerson Lane, was charged with theft and falsifying business records -- both felony offenses.

Source: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20100202/NEWS/100202033/Manager+charged+with+embezzlement

9Oct/100

Taking Out the Trash

Employees are taking out your trash and your merchandise. It happens all the time. Taking out the trash is an opportunity for your employees to remove your merchandise so they or an accomplice can return later to collect what they've stolen. Strong controls around trash removal are an important part of any comprehensive loss prevention plan.

  • Require two employees to take out the trash. If that's not possible they need to have another employee check the trash for merchandise just prior to removing from the building.
  • Have set times to take out trash.
  • Collect all trash into one location prior to removal to dumpster.
  • Invest in a compactor, and require all trash to be put into the compactor. Don't let employees leave trash outside the compactor.
  • Regularly inspect your dumpster/trash area for merchandise.
  • Use clear trash bags.
  • Require all boxes to be broken down/folded flat.

The key to any program (loss prevention or otherwise) is to follow and enforce procedures.

9Oct/100

Refund Fraud Indicators

I've compiled a list of useful refund fraud indicators...

  • Multipe refunds, one receipt: Can indicate that a customer returned one item, and the cashier/manager is using the receipt to refund the remaining items for cash.
  • UPC keyed, not scanned: Could mean that cashier/manager is using a found receipt to key in UPCs of items to refund (since the actual item isn't at the desk).
  • Multiples of a single item: Item may be available or near the register, and cashier/manager uses that item to refund for cash.
  • Percent of refund dollars to sales dollars/Percent of refund transactions/sales transactions: Deviation from the company/store average can indicate fraudlent refund transactions.
  • Multiple refunds to same credit card: It's not unusual for a person committing refund fraud to refund the money to their own credit card/debit card(or an accomplice's card).
  • Loose receipts at register: Receipts left behind by customers or reprinted receipts are left at register instead of being thrown away immediately.
  • Reprinted receipt used for refund: A reprinted receipt (your receipts do indicate "Not original receipt" or "Duplicate" when reprinted?) is used for a refund could indicate cashier/manager reprinted the receipt to use for a refund.
  • Refunds that occur before or after store hours.

Any additional methods you use?